For some reason, I initially had such a firm conviction that my husband's fractures (after the car a…

For some reason, I initially had such a firm conviction that my husband's fractures (after the car accident; I've already posted about this) were fixed so skillfully that everything would heal properly. But no... So, tomorrow, October 21st, after 11 PM (Moscow time), they will perform a second surgery. Already at the Ilizarov Center. They will finally install this metal apparatus externally, while removing the pins and fixations from inside. It turned out that the gap between the pins inside was made excessive, and the bones (bone fragments) simply couldn't heal: there just isn't enough bone tissue to grow. A false bone callus began to form, plus ankle contracture; the foot wouldn't bend. Moreover, this was discovered almost "at the last moment": my husband screamed at the entire medical commission (who were trying to discharge him from the hospital altogether: "well, you can walk, even if sideways.."), threatened with various real consequences—and only then did they send him for a consultation at Ilizarov's. In late September. And there, the doctor said the operation should have been done back in August—we almost missed it. And afterwards, my husband will have to visit those very doctors every two weeks to "adjust the screws," doctors who allegedly didn't notice something was wrong and should have referred him to the Ilizarov Center. If my husband hadn't delved into the process himself and constantly consulted with AI—I don't know what this would have turned out to be. Well, October 21st is tomorrow—they're doing it again. Another spine surgery. The doctor said, "if things go wrong regarding inflammation of the flesh, we'll keep him longer than two weeks..". As for the legal cases. Right before hospitalization, there was a civil court session. The judge very skillfully protected the expert who wrote a false report (if anyone needs details for their own case—message me privately, I'll explain how it's done.., who told us this earlier..). There were two moments that made it clear: the judge and the expert personally know each other, but the judge refused to break the law by openly exposing himself. Result: the case was transferred to criminal court. And there—it's unknown now how honest the investigators will be. A new, expensive expert opinion seems unavoidable. And yes, there are deadlines within which the victim must personally appear before the investigator (in any condition!). I can't even bring the documents instead of my husband; his presence and passport are required. In short, the saga continues. I'm also exhausted. That's all... P. S. Oh, how much I miss my acoustic guitar right now and can't buy one yet...